Smart card assistance for generating digital signatures is current state of the art and bestpractice. This is mainly due to the fact that smart cards now a days have enough processingpower to produce digital signatures for documents by on card resources (processor and memory)only. This way the owner’s private signing key never has to leave the smart card: The signingkey is and remains permanently stored in a tamper proof environment. A closer look at thesigning process however reveals a still existing major security problem: the problem known asthe “what you see is what you sign” problem. Before signing a document the signer usuallywants to check the document’s syntactic and semantic correctness.
When compared to the traditional process of signing a paper document with a hand writtensignature, the difference can easily be identified: In the traditional case, it is relativelyeasy for the user to assert the correctness, because syntactic and semantic document checkingand signature generation are in immediate context. Digitally signing an electronic documentis completely different, because checking and signature generation are executed in twodifferent environments, exposing fundamentally different characteristics different withrespect to security on the one hand and processor, memory, and display resources on the other hand.
Traditionally, the signing application computes the document’s digest using a one way hashfunction and sends the result to the smart card. The card encrypts the digest by an asymmetriccipher using the signing key stored on the card. The resulting value is the digital signatureof the document. It is sent back to the signing application. The user can neither check thesyntactic correctness of the document (in case of XML documents: well formedness, validity)nor the semantic correctness of the document. What really is signed is beyond the user’scontrol. It might for instance be the digest for a manipulated document. Even if the smartcard can be regarded as tamper proof, the terminal (e.g. a PC) and the programs running onit are vulnerable to viruses and Trojan horses. Such evildoers might obviously also affectsigning applications and let them produce valid signatures for from the user’s perspectiveinvalid documents. Such incidents invalidate the signing process in total.
We propose an enhanced architecture which performs checking and signing of XML documents onJava smart cards, called JXCS architecture. The basic idea of JXCS is to shift the syntacticvalidation and hash value generation from the vulnerable PC to the trusted smart card.Syntactic validation imposes the following challenges and opportunities: Challenging is theneed of processing XML documents on resource constraint Java smart cards. The opportunity ofthe approach is the possibility to perform syntactic and even semantic checks on the XMLdocument in a tamper proof environment which improves the security of the signing process.We propose the need for three major checks on the XML documents to be signed: Wellformedness, validity and content acknowledgement using a class 3 card reader. Taken togetherall three checks can defeat “what you see is what you sign” attacks.